20151010M
PUTIN &
SYRIA
This Awareness is now available,
please proceed.
Thank you. Welcome Awareness and
thank you for being with us today for the Rainbow-Phoenix membership session of
October 10, 2015. Will Berlinghof is the Voice for Cosmic Awareness, Joan Mills
the questioner and energizer. The Law of Light, the Law of Love, the Law of
Unity and the Law of Gratitude have been invoked. Is there an opening message
or any event you would like to discuss at this time please?
That there is no opening message at
this time, that this Awareness senses the primary question will serve as that
which will attend the important matters that are at hand, that are occurring.
Therefore, the opening message will be contained in the answer to the question
that is about to be asked. Please proceed.
Thank you. This is my question. I was thinking about the bombing of Syrian
targets by the Russians and the U.S. suggesting it was more than the Syrian
targets. Is there any truth to this, or
does he, meaning President Putin, does he have an agenda that is relevant to
the present situation? Your thoughts please.
That this Awareness would point out
that these are two ideological opposites clashing, the ideological sentiment of
the democratic world or the alleged democratic world that is the Western world
that is led by the United States and backed up by the United Kingdoms versus
that which is alleged to be a non-democratic country, a Communist country,
although it is not Communist any longer as it was once defined.
But there is a propaganda war going
on, and that those in the Western democratic nations are being hit daily by the
propaganda that Putin and Russia are the evil empire, are the ones that are
opposed to democratic freedom. That this is being played out in the situation
in the Middle East, in particular in Syria at this time.
Thus it must be that the Western
nations, especially America and Great Britain, maintain that argument that
Putin and Russia are not bombing only ISIS or Islamic State targets, but are
indeed bombing the targets that have to do with those that are called moderate
rebels.
The interesting fact that must be
observed here, to have discernment about this issue of being able to see the
philosophic and ideological war that is also going on at this time over
Russia's participation in the Middle East, in the affairs of Syria, is that
this has much to do with the worldwide situation that is also taking place and
how there are those Powers That Be that are still seeking to create a situation
worldwide where instability is created and then the plans of the
powers-that-be, those that this Awareness would actually now call the
powers-that-were, can be implemented and carried out.
That the Middle East and Syria are
very much part of their greater plans to create worldwide instability, that
will enable them to more easily carry out their plans.
That Russia is also aware of this
and Putin being the leader of Russia, the figure head, is diametrically opposed
to the plans of those who have their hidden agendas. He is definitely aware to
the point that he has over the last several years, stood up against these ones.
First in his own country by destroying the oligarchies, by destroying those who
were figureheads for the Western powers, the powers-that-were, who were trying
to take over Russia. Indeed, it could be said they had great control already in
Russia. Then the incident in the Ukraine and Eastern Ukraine, that which was
the traditional territories of Russia, the East Crimean regions, the Crimean
regions and Eastern Ukraine regions, coming back to the Russians. At least the
Crimea did so, and the civil war that is occurring in Eastern Ukraine is about
this as well. A traditional people returning back to their own peoples, the
people of Russia.
But there has been much
interference, much propaganda that has painted the Russians as ones who are the
enemy. Taking this forward now to the situation in Syria, the irony and paradox
here is that the NATO ones through such spokespeople as John Kerry are saying that
the only real solution is to bring peace to this region, then these ones are
doing the exact opposite. That there is sufficient evidence to prove that
America has been funding and training ISIS, the Islamic State, these
Jhidadists. That they have been supporting them by leaving equipment, military
equipment there and that they have also, through their bombing, been attacking
not only ISOL targets but other targets where civilians have been killed. The
latest is of course the bombing of the hospital in that region, in the Iraq
region.
That these actions do belay the
truth of the situation, expose the truth of the situation, that while they
speak of bringing peace to the region, instead their actions and the support of
the very ones that they have labeled as the dreaded enemy are of a nature that
not only supports them, but promotes them.
Now you have the situation of Putin
coming in to the situation of Syria, coming in to support the legitimate
president Bashar al-Assad. That most believe that this one is a despot, a
dictator, an evil tyrant. Why is this so? It is so because the propaganda has painted
him to be this, and there has been little questioning of this, that there has
been little questioning of the support the moderate rebels have received to
oppose this one because it is not in the agenda of the powers-that-were to have
it otherwise. Their agenda, which is about creating instability in that region,
requires that Bashar al-Assad be the enemy, be the tyrant that must be deposed.
That this ties in with the fantasy of how evil dictators are overthrown by
righteous ones, by those who are desiring freedom and democracy, all of the old
ploys being pulled and carried out here of opposition of an evil dictator so
that the people can be freed.
But the people were relatively free
in the first place. Their standard of living quite high, they had security,
they had homes, they had institutes that supported them, they were happy in
their country until this plan was launched to disaffect that stability, to
disconnect it. This was not only a plan for Syria but for the whole region,
Libya being the first that came under the new agenda creating instability in
that region. That what is now the case with Libya now that Gaddafi has been
removed and executed is a country in strife and turmoil, total upheaval. That
it is not exactly what was promised by the aligned countries that participated
in the overthrow, even though indirectly it could be argued of Gaddafi and his
regime.
That the bigger plan went then to
Syria, to overthrow Bashar al-Assad to create a similar situation in Syria,
leaving it also affected as Libya. But Bashar al-Assad refused to abdicate and
went against those ones and their plans, so much so that the efforts of the
United States and its allies had to eventually come to a point where they were
intervening themselves, bombing Syria, a nation that was not and is not at war
with the NATO countries, the Western backed countries, and yet these ones are
creating the instability in this region under the guise and banner of they are
the cavalry come in to help the poor Syrians and Iraqis, but is this so?
Then you have this new piece that
has been added, this piece of Russia entering, Putin supporting Assad and
making a difference. Ironically, in a way of bringing a stability back to
the government, more has been achieved in a relatively short time than has been
achieved in over a year of bombing of Syria by the NATO backed nations.
That this would create, if Bashar
al-Assad's forces were able to quell the rebels and the rebellion, a stable
situation in Syria where those who are homeless would again be able to build
and rebuild their homes and their lives. Those who have fled would perhaps even
return if such stability could be brought back to Syria and those who were and
are the real enemies be dealt with and driven out. This is what Russia is
offering, but this is the anthesis of that which America and England and the
NATO backed countries wished to achieve, for theirs is a long term agenda and
it was very crucial and is very crucial to them to create this instability,
disharmony in that region, not only Syria, but Iraq, Iran and other Middle East
countries, even Egypt. That this is being thwarted by the Russians'
participation in this conflict and their attempts to bolster up and secure
Assad and his legitimate government.
That it is a huge propaganda war and
that you have the choice of choosing either to believe those who are stating
that they are there to help the rebels and sweep an illegitimate ruler out of
power, or to believe the other side,
that the illegitimate ruler Bashar al-Assad is the legitimate ruler and that
the actions of supporting him and assisting him are those actions that will
bring stability back to this region. But the most important thing this
Awareness would emphasize: do not be fooled by the propaganda, do not simply be
reduced to a binary dualistic choice of one or the other. Hold that this region
will be restored, hold that peace will come to it. Do not be deceived by either
sides' claims, but know that this is a point of contention that is very
relevant in the world and to see through the propaganda, the lies, the
deceptions, perhaps on both sides, is the only way to see this situation
clearly and to understand that one must rise above it, and that the first place
to do so is within one's own context, within one's own interpretation of
reality and to see things, not from a binary dualistic level, a choice of them
or us, right or wrong, but from a higher level where this is a situation of
transition at the greatest and deepest levels.
That this is another matter that
this Awareness will speak to perhaps on another occasion, but for now It is
complete in the answering of this question.
Thank you Awareness. May I ask
"what is the bottom line purpose that the U.S. and Great Britain and NATO
desire? Is it to confiscate the oil, or what is going on here? Why is Syria so
desirable?"
First Syria is not desirable at this
time as the prize, it is not about the oil, that this would only be a bonus to
those nations who control such nations as Syria or other oil-producing
countries, such as Libya. But it is not the reason why it is a bonus point, as
already spoken.
The real reason is to create
worldwide instability but specifically to create instability in Europe. This being
achieved by the masses of the people, the refugees that are flooding Europe at
this time. That this will create tension in those countries that receive a
large amount of refugees. That this will cause a conflict between the
inhabitants of the countries these refugees are being taken into as well as the
refugees themselves against those who have taken them in. That this will help the situation down the road, where the
plan is to declare marshal law around the world, country by country, and that
this is the real agenda behind the disruption of the Middle East, the
unbalancing of the balance that was previously there and also the same in
Europe, to topple the balance that has been so for the last 60-70 years since
the end of the second world war.
Thank you, is there additional on
that?
This is sufficient for now.
Thank you, I appreciate that
response. It will help to put everything into perspective. Thank you Awareness.
That you are welcome.
Channeller: Will Berlinghof
Webpage: RAinbow Phoenix
No comments:
Post a Comment